John Langford • 12/1/2020

Experiments with the ICML 2020 Peer-Review Process

Read Original

This article details a study conducted with ICML 2020, examining biases in the academic peer-review process. It summarizes three experiments on resubmission bias (finding reviewers score lower if aware of prior rejection), herding effects in reviewer discussions, and reviewer recruiting strategies, offering insights for improving conference fairness.

0 comments
#Machine Learning #research methodology #conference organization
Experiments with the ICML 2020 Peer-Review Process

Comments

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!

Browser Extension

Get instant access to AllDevBlogs from your browser

Top of the Week

1
The Beautiful Web
Jens Oliver Meiert • 2 votes
2
When your coding agent doesn’t understand your project, you’ll get junk
Benjamin Cane • 1 votes
3
LLM Use in the Python Source Code
Miguel Grinberg • 1 votes
4
Wagon’s algorithm in Python
John D. Cook • 1 votes
5
An example conversation with Claude Code
Dumm Zeuch • 1 votes