shared, util, core: Schroedinger's module names
Read OriginalThis article critiques the use of generic module names such as 'shared', 'util', and 'core' in software development. It argues these names are uninformative and can become dumping grounds for code, obscuring their purpose. The author provides examples from various languages and suggests more descriptive, purpose-driven naming conventions to improve code architecture and organization.
Comments
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!
Browser Extension
Get instant access to AllDevBlogs from your browser
Top of the Week
1
The Beautiful Web
Jens Oliver Meiert
•
2 votes
2
When your coding agent doesn’t understand your project, you’ll get junk
Benjamin Cane
•
1 votes
3
LLM Use in the Python Source Code
Miguel Grinberg
•
1 votes
4
Wagon’s algorithm in Python
John D. Cook
•
1 votes
5
An example conversation with Claude Code
Dumm Zeuch
•
1 votes